Spring Never Quite Sprung

May marks the fifth consecutive month of declines for national home price gains, while performance at the ZIP code level remains widely variable.

TRUCKEE, Calif. – June 2, 2014Clear Capital, the premium provider of data and solutions for real estate asset valuation and collateral risk assessment, today released its Home Data Index™ (HDI) Market Report with data through May 2014. Using a broad array of public and proprietary data sources, the HDI Market Report publishes the most granular home data and analysis earlier than nearly any other index provider in the industry.

  • With expectations high heading into spring, it’s been a decidedly underwhelming season. May marks the fifth consecutive month national yearly home price growth has softened. By year’s end, home prices are expected to normalize in the sub 5% annual growth range. Stay tuned for Clear Capital’s latest forecast in July’s HDI Market Report.
  • Good deals do exist, but you need to work harder to find them. Savvy investors with deeper market insight into current market dynamics will be rewarded. Despite a lethargic spring buying season, the range of home price growth across the 50 major metro markets may surprise you – 22.3 percentage points over the last year (see Graph 1: MSA vs. ZIP Code Performance). A deeper dive into metro markets’ ZIP code price change over the last year reveals a range, from -37% to +45%.
  • The old adage “location, location, location” still applies. Large local market variances like we see in Cleveland, OH are proof of this. When stacked up against other major metro markets, Cleveland has the largest variation in ZIP code performance. The top performing Cleveland ZIP saw 42.3% annual growth, while its lowest performer saw -23.3%. Sure, you can get lucky with a broad market approach in markets like Rochester, NY, where the spread is narrow – just 4.4 percentage points. But this is the exception; given 44 major metro markets saw a spread greater than 15 percentage points over the last year. Even in stronger performing markets, like California and Florida (see Chart 2: Highest Performing Major Metro Markets), there is wide variation at the ZIP code level (see Graph 1: MSA vs. ZIP Code Performance).

“It’s no surprise that the spring buying season isn’t moving the needle this year,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta, vice president of research and analytics at Clear Capital. “The rising price floor in the low tier sector of the market has squeezed investor returns, thereby removing a key demand segment. We don’t expect to see a large pop in prices through the summer buying season. It’s likely we’ll keep chugging along at our current pace, somewhere around 1% quarterly gains for the rest of the year.

Considering the number of key housing fundamentals that remain stressed, like millions of borrowers still underwater, high levels of student debt, potential borrowers with less than perfect credit, and a job market that is still recovering, we don’t expect a market with waning investor demand to withstand any eye-popping rates of growth. Although it’s not a quick fix to the larger housing problem, home price moderation is really a healthy move for the market overall. While some might be discouraged by a weak spring buying season, we are encouraged that price trends are finally calibrating back to pre-bubble norms. Despite other headwinds, moderating home prices will serve as the foundation to a more balanced market moving forward.

Remember, we’re still in recovery mode which means deals exist. Market participants just need to look deeper. As softer gains continue to unfold, broad stroke investment approaches will prove less and less fruitful. As such, market participants who pin point investments will be better positioned for success.”

Graph 1: ZIP Code Yearly Growth Range within Major Metro Markets.

 National and Regional Markets
Market Qtr/Qtr Yr/Yr Distressed Saturation
National 0.9% 9.2% 20.3%
West 1.6% 15.0% 15.9%
Northeast 0.5% 5.2% 15.4%
South 0.8% 8.0% 23.2%
Midwest 0.6% 8.8% 26.1%

Chart 1: National and Regional Markets – May 2014. Source: Clear Capital

 Highest Performing Major Metro Markets
Qtr/Qtr Rank Metropolitan Statistical Area Qtr/Qtr % +/- Yr/Yr Distressed  Saturation
1 Riverside, CA – San Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA 2.2% 20.5% 18.0%
2 Miami, FL – Ft. Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL 2.1% 17.3% 27.3%
3 San Francisco, CA – Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA 2.0% 20.5% 10.2%
4 Los Angeles, CA – Long Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA 1.7% 18.1% 12.9%
5 San Diego, CA – Carlsbad, CA – San Marcos, CA 1.7% 17.4% 14.3%
6 Orlando, FL 1.7% 14.4% 33.3%
7 Fresno, CA 1.7% 15.8% 22.7%
8 San Jose, CA – Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA 1.7% 17.0% 5.7%
9 Bakersfield, CA 1.6% 16.4% 22.6%
10 Boston, MA – Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA 1.6% 12.2% 13.0%
11 Oxnard, CA – Thousand Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA 1.6% 16.5% 12.5%
12 Sacramento, CA – Arden, CA – Roseville, CA 1.6% 19.2% 18.2%
13 Dayton, OH 1.5% 9.5% 25.5%
14 Las Vegas, NV – Paradise, NV 1.5% 16.5% 26.1%
15 Atlanta, GA – Sandy Springs, GA – Marietta, GA 1.5% 19.2% 23.7%

Chart 2: Highest Performing Major Metro Markets – April 2014. Source: Clear Capital

 Lowest Performing Major Metro Markets
Qtr/Qtr Rank Metropolitan Statistical Area Qtr/Qtr % +/- Yr/Yr Distressed  Saturation
1 New Orleans, LA – Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA -1.9% 0.8% 17.1%
2 Memphis, TN -1.2% 4.1% 30.6%
3 Milwaukee, WI – Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI -0.8% 2.7% 25.0%
4 Jacksonville, FL -0.2% 6.3% 42.1%
5 Hartford, CT – West Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT -0.1% 5.0% 18.5%
6 Pittsburgh, PA -0.1% -1.0% 16.0%
7 Rochester, NY 0.0% 2.0% 9.9%
8 Birmingham, AL – Hoover, AL 0.2% 4.8% 19.0%
9 Raleigh, NC – Cary, NC 0.2% 3.6% 9.7%
10 Baltimore, MD – Towson, MD 0.3% 4.0% 23.8%
11 Virginia Beach, VA – Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA 0.5% 5.0% 23.0%
12 Honolulu, HI 0.5% 5.1% 6.5%
13 Richmond, VA 0.5% 4.3% 22.6%
14 Philadelphia, PA – Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE 0.5% 4.5% 20.3%
15 Louisville, KY 0.5% 5.0% 17.1%

Subscribe to our newsletter

We’ll keep you in the loop on the latest stories, events, and industry news.